Can You Reopen a Workers’ Comp Claim in New York?

Yes, you may be able to reopen a workers’ compensation claim in New York after it has been closed, but the answer depends on how the case ended, how much time has passed, and why you need the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board to act again.

A case marked “no further action” is not the same as a case that was truly closed for purposes of Workers’ Compensation Law Section 123. A final Section 32 waiver agreement is different from both. If a Section 32 agreement permanently settled wage-loss benefits, medical benefits, or both, the settled issues generally cannot be reopened unless all interested parties agree to a modification and the Board approves it.

You should review the most recent Board decision, your payment history, current medical evidence, and any settlement documents before deciding what to file. Cole, Sorrentino, Hurley, Hewner & Gambino, P.C. helps injured workers in Buffalo and nearby areas throughout Western New York review workers’ compensation claims and determine which procedural step may apply.

For an overview of the firm’s workers’ compensation practice, visit:

https://www.colesorrentino.com/buffalo-workers-compensation-lawyers/

Can You Reopen a Workers’ Comp Claim in New York?

Yes, New York law gives the Workers’ Compensation Board continuing jurisdiction over workers’ compensation cases. That continuing authority does not mean that every closed case can be reopened at any time.

A request for rehearing or reopening under 12 NYCRR 300.14 may be based on one of three grounds:

• Material evidence that was not available at the time of the earlier hearing
  • A change in your condition that is material to the issue involved
  • Reopening in the interest of justice

The Board has discretion to decide whether those grounds have been established. Separate statutory limits can restrict an award even when a request for further action is filed.

The first question is what “closed” means in your file. A claim may be inactive because the Board marked it for no further action. A different claim may be truly closed because no further proceedings were contemplated. A Section 32 settlement may permanently resolve specified benefits.

Before you ask the Board to reopen a claim, identify exactly how the prior case ended. The wording of the last Board decision and any Section 32 agreement can change the analysis.

Why Might You Ask to Reopen a Workers’ Compensation Claim?

You may need further Board action when your medical condition, disability status, work status, or benefit payments change after a case becomes inactive.

Examples can include:

• Your established work-related condition becomes worse.
  • New diagnostic testing documents a material change in the established condition.
  • Your doctor identifies new work restrictions or a different level of disability.
  • You return to work, then lose time again because of the established work injury.
  • Wage-loss payments stop or are reduced while a compensable disability remains at issue.
  • Material evidence becomes available that was not available at the earlier hearing.
  • A dispute develops over treatment or another issue in an accepted claim.

For example, assume you injured your lower back while working in a Buffalo warehouse. You received treatment and wage benefits, returned to work, and the Board later marked the case for no further action. Months later, your symptoms worsen and new testing documents a material change related to the established injury. Depending on the record, the timing, and the applicable legal limits, you may have grounds to ask the Board to act again.

A worsening condition alone does not automatically produce a new award. The medical evidence, procedural history, timing, and prior decisions still matter.

What Evidence Can Support a Request to Reopen a Workers’ Compensation Claim?

Medical evidence is often central when you are asking for further action because your condition changed. A recent medical report should address the issues that matter to the request, which may include your diagnosis, current symptoms, work restrictions, degree of disability, treatment recommendations, and the relationship between the current problem and the established work injury.

Records that may help include:

• Recent examination reports
  • MRI, X-ray, EMG, or other diagnostic results
  • Updated work-status notes
  • Records of surgery, injections, therapy, or specialist care
  • Pay stubs or schedules showing reduced earnings
  • Documentation of injury-related absences
  • Prior Workers’ Compensation Board decisions
  • Records showing the last payment of compensation
  • A copy of any Section 32 waiver agreement
  • Other evidence tied directly to the reason you are asking the Board to act

If you do not have an attorney and want the Board to act on an issue in your claim, the Board provides Form RFA-1W, Request for Assistance by Injured Worker. If you have legal counsel, your representative may submit Form RFA-1LC, Request for Further Action by Legal Counsel. The Board currently requires RFA-1LC requests to be submitted electronically.

The right filing depends on the posture of your case and the issue that needs Board action.

For information about wage and medical benefits, visit:

https://www.colesorrentino.com/buffalo-workers-compensation-lawyers/types-of-benefits/

How Does Workers’ Compensation Law Section 123 Affect Reopening?

Workers’ Compensation Law Section 123 gives the Board continuing jurisdiction, but it also places limits on certain older cases.

For a truly closed case in which compensation was previously awarded, Section 123 can prevent a new award of compensation when both of these periods have passed:

• 18 years from the date of injury or death
  • Eight years from the date of the last payment of compensation

Both periods must have elapsed for this part of Section 123 to apply.

New York courts have explained that this time limit applies to cases that were truly closed and later reopened. It does not bar continuing consideration of a case that remained open because further proceedings were contemplated. Whether a case was truly closed is a fact-specific question that can depend on the language of Board decisions and unresolved issues in the record.

Section 123 also contains a separate seven-year rule for certain claims that were disallowed after a hearing on the merits, or otherwise disposed of without an award after the parties received notice and an opportunity to be heard. In those situations, the statute can bar reopening after seven years from the date of the accident or death.

The date of the last payment of compensation is especially relevant to the 18-year and eight-year rule. Medical treatment after an old claim does not necessarily mean that a new indemnity award remains available. You should review the actual Board file instead of assuming that continued medical care resets the Section 123 time period.

Related Videos

What If Your Claim Was Settled Under Section 32?

A final Section 32 waiver agreement changes the analysis because it can permanently settle specific parts of a workers’ compensation claim.

A Section 32 agreement may resolve:

• Wage-loss or indemnity benefits
  • Medical benefits
  • Both indemnity and medical benefits

Once the Board’s approval becomes final, the issues resolved by the agreement generally cannot be reopened simply because your condition becomes worse, you need surgery, or your financial circumstances change.

The Workers’ Compensation Board states that a final Section 32 agreement can be modified only if all interested parties agree to the modification and the Board approves it.

If your Section 32 agreement settled both indemnity and future medical benefits, you generally cannot return to the Board later and request more benefits for those settled issues. If the agreement settled indemnity benefits but left medical treatment open, medical benefits may remain available under the terms of the agreement.

Read the actual agreement before assuming that every part of your claim was closed.

Is Reopening the Same as Appealing a Workers’ Compensation Decision?

No. Reopening and appealing are different procedures.

If a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge recently issued a decision and you disagree with it, the proper step may be an Application for Board Review rather than a reopening request. The Workers’ Compensation Board states that an application for review of a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge decision generally must be filed within 30 calendar days of the filing date of that decision.

The Board uses Form RB-89 for an Application for Board Review. The same form is also used for an application for rehearing or reopening under 12 NYCRR 300.14, but the legal basis, timing, and requested relief are different.

A recent denial should be reviewed quickly so you can identify whether you are dealing with:

• An insurance carrier dispute
  • A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge decision
  • A request for rehearing or reopening
  • An older claim marked for no further action
  • A final Section 32 settlement
  • A new workplace injury that may require a new claim

For more information about denied claims, visit:

https://www.colesorrentino.com/denied-workers-compensation-claims/

What Should You Do Before Asking the Board to Reopen the Case?

Start with the claim record. Gather the documents that show how the case ended and what has changed.

Create a timeline that includes:

• The original injury date
  • The dates of major Board decisions
  • The date of the last payment of compensation
  • The date you returned to work, if applicable
  • The date your symptoms or disability changed
  • New treatment or diagnostic testing dates
  • Any new periods of lost time
  • The date and terms of any Section 32 agreement

Then compare the new issue with the old record. If your request is based on a change in condition, your medical records should explain that change. If your request is based on previously unavailable evidence, the evidence should relate directly to the issue you want the Board to reconsider.

If you are still receiving treatment, give your medical provider an accurate history of the original injury, current symptoms, work restrictions, and changes since the earlier Board decision.

If you suffered a new workplace accident rather than a worsening of the established injury, a new workers’ compensation claim may be the proper route.

For information about the first steps after a new work injury, visit:

https://www.colesorrentino.com/buffalo-workers-compensation-lawyers/injured-on-the-job/

How Can a Buffalo Workers’ Compensation Attorney Help With a Closed Claim?

A reopening question may require review of several parts of your claim file. A workers’ compensation attorney can examine the procedural history and identify whether the issue calls for a request for further action, an application for rehearing or reopening, an administrative appeal, or a new claim.

Legal counsel may review:

• Board decisions and notices
  • Medical records and disability findings
  • Payment history
  • Prior awards
  • Section 32 settlement documents
  • Section 123 dates
  • New evidence
  • Current work status and wage information

The goal is to match the current problem with the correct procedure and supporting evidence.

Cole, Sorrentino, Hurley, Hewner & Gambino, P.C. has provided legal advice and representation in Western New York for more than 45 years and offers personal attention to clients.

Speak With a Buffalo Workers’ Compensation Attorney About a Closed Claim

If an old work injury has worsened, your benefits have stopped, or you are unsure whether a prior workers’ compensation claim can be reopened, you can have the claim history reviewed before you decide what to file.

Call 716-869-3011 to request a legal consultation with Cole, Sorrentino, Hurley, Hewner & Gambino, P.C.

You can also contact the firm at:

https://www.colesorrentino.com/contact/

The firm serves injured workers in Buffalo and nearby areas throughout Western New York.

This article is for general informational purposes only. It is not legal advice or a legal opinion about any specific facts or circumstances. Every workers’ compensation case is different. You should speak with a qualified attorney about your specific situation.